Unoccupied Centers in Moscow Conceptualism
Collective Actions’ Journeys into Nothingness
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21248/thewis.6.2017.73Abstract
In the following I am interested in looking at KD as embodied thinking, as a “philosophical practice”. I borrow this term (filosofskaya praktika) from the Dictionary of Moscow Conceptualism, which defines it as a “ritualized part of philosophy”, as a “type of activity or a quasi-ritual addition of a practical component to philosophy”. KD’s activities can be seen as concrete philosophy, which is expressed not in concepts but in concrete objects, sounds, performative actions etc. In the sixth volume of the Journeys, Monastyrsky writes that actions are “sort of self-sufficient philosophizings with legs, body, sounds".
Literaturhinweise
Agamov-Tupitsyn, Viktor/Monastyrsky, Andrei: Tet-a-Tet: Perepiska, Dialogi, Interpretacia, Faktografia. Vologda 2013.
Barabanov, Yevgeniy: “Moscow Conceptualism: Between Self-Definition and Doctrine”, in: Rosenfeld, Alla (ed.): Moscow Conceptualism in Context. New Brunswick 2005, pp. 48-99.
Degot, Ekaterina: “Batiskaf konzenpualizma”, in: Degot, Ekaterina/Zakharov, Vadim (eds.): Moskovskii Konzeptualism – Moscow Conceptualism. Moscow 2005. p. 17.
Epstein, Mikhail. “Philosophical Implications of Moscow Conceptualism”, in: Journal for Eurasian Studies 1:1 (2010), pp. 64-71.
Kabakov, Ilya/Kabakova, Emiliya: Zhizn mukh (Life of Flies). Bielefeld 2008.
Monastyrsky, Andrei: Poezdki Za Gorod: Kollektivnye Deistvia. Vol. 4. Moscow 1998, p. 450.
Monastyrsky, Andrei (ed.): Slovari terminov moskovskoi kontzeptualinoi shkoly. Moscow 1999. http://www.conceptualism-moscow.org/page?id=313. (Anm. d. Red: Website ist nicht mehr verfügbar)
Nancy, Jean-Luc: Being Singular Plural. Transl. by Robert D. Richardson/Anne E. O’Byrne. Stanford 2000.
Nancy, Jean-Luc: The Inoperative Community. Transl. by Peter Connor et al. Minneapolis 1991.
Tupitsyn, Viktor: Glaznoe Yabloko Razdora: Besedy s Ilyei Kabakovym. Moscow 2006.

